Showing posts with label Argument. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Argument. Show all posts

Friday, 15 April 2016

Unit 3: Lesson 8 (April 15)

As you work on your outline for your Summative Argument, consider the feedback from the formative task:

  • Claim needs to be compelling (work on synthesis of ideas rather then listing arguments)
  • Credible detailed evidence (all evidence must have a citation)
  • Analysis should explain HOW the evidence supports arguments/thesis
  • Transition between paragraphs with ideas rather then transitional words
  • Conclusion needs to synthesize arguments into larger 'So what?'. Call to action should provide a solution to the problem. 
  • MLA (in-text and works cited page)


By the end of today's class: Completed Research Portfolio AND detailed essay outline in drop. 

Monday, 11 April 2016

Unit 3: Lesson 6 (April 11)

Credibility of Sources

With a partner, look at the articles that you collected for homework and assess their credibility based on the information below. Keep this in mind as you are developing your research portfolio.


Examples of sources that are often the most credible:

      Official government websites
      Institutional sites that represent universities, regulatory agencies, governing bodies, and respected organizations with specific expertise (e.g., the Mayo Clinic)
      Peer-reviewed journals
      Reputable news sources

Examples of sources that are often considered less credible:

      Blogs
      Web forums
      Individual or business websites
      Materials published by an entity that may have an ulterior motive


Factors to consider
Least reliable
Possibly reliable
Most reliable
Type of source
Unfamiliar website
Published material
Official websites, institutional sites, academic journals
Author’s background
Uncredited
Educated on topic
Expert in the field
Date published
None
Outdated
Recently revised
Depth of review
Controversial reviews
Good public response; general approval
Peer-reviewed by reliable sources
Sources cited
None
Credible sources
Citations referencing other well-cited works
Objectivity
Clearly biased
Sponsored source
Balanced, neutral



CLASS REVIEW: Research Rubric


Work on Research portfolio. Make sure that you have completed the reflection of skills and developing a research questions sections of the Summative Proposal. This will be discussed at the individual writing conferences this week. 


H/W- Work on research portfolio. Make sure that you are demonstrating questioning and showing your insights and connections. 

Thursday, 7 April 2016

Unit 3: Lesson 5 (April 7)

That's debatable.... 

It is now time to start thinking about the summative task. A good argumentative essay is based on a clear thesis and supported by detailed research. Before you can begin writing, you need to identify a topic of interest.

BRAINSTORM: Gender, Identity and Worth in Sport

  • Spend 10 mins looking at the flipboard on 'Gender, worth and Identity in Sport'. 
  • Generate a list of all potential topics for the summative task. 
  • Share with your table group and generate a detailed list. 


Developing a research question

Each table will select a topic of interest

1) Generate a list of possible questions about the topic- be creative, jot-down all ideas- there are NO bad questions at this point.

2) Select 3 of the most promising questions (should be debatable and interesting). Complete the checklist below for each question.

  • Is the scope of your question appropriate: not too wide, not too narrow?
  • Is it manageable within the time constraints allowed? (2 research periods; 1 planning period; 2 writing periods)
  • Will the answer fit word requirements of the assignment? (2-3 pages)
  • Can you find sufficient and timely information in the library?
  • Will Internet, Web, and field research produce more source material?
  • Is your question simple enough to seek just one answer, not several?
  • Is it specific enough that your audience will understand your objective?
  • Will the results be interesting? Does it concern a real and debatable issue?
  • Does your question really interest you? Do you honestly crave the answer?

  • 3) Refine your questions based on your answers above. Be ready to share your research questions with the class.


    Summative Argument Proposal

    Start working on your summative proposal (in drop). By next class, you need to have a clear research question and two annotated articles in your research portfolio (articles must look at different sides of the question).

    H/W: By next class, you need to have a clear research question and two annotated articles in your research portfolio (articles must look at different sides of the question).  

    Tuesday, 5 April 2016

    Unit 3: Lesson 4 (April 5)

    Work time to finish your formative argument

    Develop your original piece on violence in sport into full argument. Take a strong stance and use persuasive techniques to convince your audience of your point of view. Your piece should be about 5-6 paragraphs in length (2 pages; double-spaced). All sources must be cited using MLA format (both in-text citations AND works cited page). Your writing will be graded using the Argumentative Rubric.


    Formative tasks must be submitted to drop at the END of class.

    Friday, 1 April 2016

    Unit 3: Lesson 3 (April 1)

    Writing Arguments


    Share response to 'Does sport create violent people?' with a critical friend.

    Provide feedback using the Argumentative Rubric

    WARM: Area of strength

    COOL: Area that could be improved

    RAISE THE TEMP: What do you need to do to improve?


    Persuasive Techniques

    We use persuasive language to convince others to agree with our facts, share our values, accept our argument and conclusions, and adopt our way of thinking. There are many different ways to persuade people. Below are some of the more commonly used techniques.

    • Appeals to emotion
    • Evidence
    • Inclusive/exclusive language
    • Rhetorical questions
    • Analogy 
    • Hyperbole
    • Generalisations  
    • Jargon
    • Repetition
    • Alliteration and assonance
    • Imagery/Figurative language  
    • Tone 

    Read and annotate 'The fraud of the student athlete claim'

    Look for claim, evidence, counter-argument, and examples of persuasive techniques.

    Formative Argumentative Writing (Due Tuesday, 5th of April) 


    Develop your original piece on violence in sport into full argument. Take a strong stance and use persuasive techniques to convince your audience of your point of view. Your piece should be about 5-6 paragraphs in length (2 pages; double-spaced). All sources must be cited using MLA format (both in-text citations AND works cited page). Your writing will be graded using the Argumentative Rubric.

    Argumentative writing outline (planning document)



    H/W: Complete your formative argument and submit to dropbox before next class. 


    Wednesday, 30 March 2016

    Unit 3: Lesson 2 (March 30)

    Do violent sports create violent people? 





    Share findings from the reading with your table. Create a google doc that lists main ideas and supporting evidence.

    When developing an argument, we need 

    • Thesis/claim (overarching idea)
    • Supporting ideas/arguments (to support the thesis)
    • Evidence for supporting ideas
    • Analysis (how the evidence supports arguments/thesis)

    Counter-argument: 



    SMALL TABLE DISCUSSION: Types of evidence for argumentative writing.


    Developing an argument: Do violent sports create violent people? 

    Create an argument to answer the prompt above. You will find the planner in your dropbox. You will need to create a thesis, provide supporting arguments with evidence, AND address and counter an opposing argument.


    H/W- Complete your argument. Focus on cohesion and transitions. 





    Monday, 28 March 2016

    Unit 3: Lesson 1 (28th of March)

    Unit 3: Identity, Gender and Worth in Sport

    During this unit, we will be looking at how sport contributes to our understanding of gender, identity, sexuality and value in society.  You will be required to write an argumentative piece about a controversial issue in sport related to one of these themes. Your writing will be assessed using the Argumentative Rubric.



    Constructing Identity through sport


    How do sports contribute to society's construction of ‘male’ and ‘female’?


    Draw the stereotypical ‘male’ and ‘female’ athlete. 
    • Draw physical characteristics of the ‘perfect’ athlete. 
    • Label/draw symbols of the personality characteristics of the ‘perfect’ athlete. 
    • List the stereotypical sports these athlete's play


    How does the media portray gender in sport?


    Discuss #TWIRLGATE


    Outrage after female tennis star is asked to ‘twirl’ on court

    In response...  What if male athletes were asked the same questions as female athletes?




    View the videos below and discuss the differences in the way male and female athletes are portrayed by the media. 


    Possible counter-argument: Do these offer opposing ideas?




    1) What is Lamoureux's thesis? 
    2) What evidence is used to support her ideas?
    3) How do the images add to her argument?
    4) What is her call to action?


    Make a list of key ideas and evidence (bullet points)

    E.g. 1) Key idea
    • evidence to support
    • evidence to support